<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Calculating Ideal Spring and Roll Bar Rates	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://suspensionsecrets.co.uk/calculating-ideal-spring-and-roll-bar-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://suspensionsecrets.co.uk/calculating-ideal-spring-and-roll-bar-rates/</link>
	<description>Performance Perfected</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 11:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: HARI KRISHNA		</title>
		<link>https://suspensionsecrets.co.uk/calculating-ideal-spring-and-roll-bar-rates/#comment-45140</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HARI KRISHNA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2020 05:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suspensionsecrets.co.uk/?p=1113#comment-45140</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This data is very much useful for beginners.tq]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This data is very much useful for beginners.tq</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mohamed Anwar		</title>
		<link>https://suspensionsecrets.co.uk/calculating-ideal-spring-and-roll-bar-rates/#comment-2230</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohamed Anwar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2019 13:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suspensionsecrets.co.uk/?p=1113#comment-2230</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fantastic Article!!
but from the diagram in the beginning, the chassis roll stiffness  closer to 192,700 right? vs 162,700 used in the calcuations or am i missing something?
Thanks again!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic Article!!<br />
but from the diagram in the beginning, the chassis roll stiffness  closer to 192,700 right? vs 162,700 used in the calcuations or am i missing something?<br />
Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
